Cool. Thanks for going out of your way to tell us how manly you are by not playing the female character and accusing others of being "virtuous" like it's an insult. Certainly makes you look more manly.
I, on the other hand, will happily be playing Kassandra, the CANON character. Peace.
Yes lol, what a quality article...
More like unplayable biological bugs.
Also, fck cancer srsly. I've lost way too many people to it. Now my influencers are suffering it too. this is pure crap
It's not so much a question of how much, but why. Contributions range from sub-$1,000 to $10,000 individually - occasionally more. In the grand scheme of things, it's not a huge sum of money per candidate each year, but in total these donations amounted to roughly $1 million spent by IPAC in 2016.
The real risk for Intel is how its contributions, and the intention behind its contributions, are perceived.
I don't have a problem with strictly cosmetic DLC. My issue is how the content is communicated to the market. Make the content absolutely clear from the initial store page rather than forcing player to consult a community guide to figure out which DLCs are the best gameplay value (especially with CK2...)
Bundles aren't a bad idea either, they would be a good way of combining the cosmetic and gameplay additions for patient gamers. People who want the newest content 'right now' can keep buying individual DLC as it becomes ready for release rather than forcing the entire market to wait for more substantial expansion-style releases.